Troubleshooting & FAQ
Answers to "why is this happening to me" questions that come up often enough to be worth writing down once. If your question isn't here, the relevant module chapter or the Glossary is the next place to check.
Why can't I see a module in the sidebar that I know Eidon has?
The sidebar only shows nav groups your workspace's edition actually has entitled β a Service Design-only workspace never shows Architecture Catalog, for example, because there's genuinely nothing in it to manage. This is different from a permissions problem: even an Admin account won't see a module the workspace isn't licensed for. Ask whoever manages your license/plan (Settings β Plan & Usage, or your platform operator) whether the module you're expecting is included.
Why is Settings missing from my sidebar?
Settings is Admin-only. Editors can create, edit and delete catalog data but never see Settings, user management, API keys or backups; Viewers are read-only everywhere. This is enforced on the backend too, not just hidden in the UI, so there's no URL workaround β you'd need an Admin to either change your role or make the specific change for you.
Why can't I edit this field, or why does the whole form look read-only?
Three unrelated things produce the same symptom. First, and most common: you're signed in as a Viewer, which is read-only across all data by design. Second, the record may be governed and currently sitting in a review/approved/published state β most governed records lock further direct edits once approved, and a published Position Paper specifically can only be revised via Supersede, not by editing the published copy directly. Third, a record on a custom-field Survey or Recertification schedule can have its "seal" broken by anyone other than the field's original owner editing it β not a lock exactly, but it flags the record as needing re-review sooner than its normal schedule. Check the record's status/governance panel before assuming it's a bug.
Why was I asked to change my password right after signing in for the first time?
Any new local-account user β including the very first bootstrap admin on a fresh install β is created with a forced password-rotation flag. The password an Admin (or the installer) set for you is, by definition, known to at least one other person, so the first real sign-in requires you to replace it with one only you know before you can do anything else. This only applies to local accounts; SSO/OIDC/LDAP sign-ins skip it entirely since Eidon never sees or sets that password.
Why am I being asked for a 6-digit code after my password?
Your workspace has multi-factor authentication turned on for local accounts (Settings β Security, Admin-only). It only applies to local username/password sign-in β SSO and LDAP sign-ins are unaffected, since MFA for those is handled by the identity provider instead, not by Eidon.
Why is the "Export to Confluence" button missing on a page that should have it?
Confluence export (and Jira/Azure DevOps work item linking) both require the connectors plan feature to be entitled on your workspace's tier. If you don't see the export action at all, check Settings β Plan & Usage rather than assuming the integration isn't configured β a missing feature entitlement looks identical to a missing configuration from the button's absence alone.
Why did some rows get skipped when I bulk-imported a CSV?
Bulk Import silently skips any row whose name duplicates an existing record of the same entity type β it's treated as "already loaded," not an error. Check the import preview step before confirming; it shows which rows will be skipped so you're not surprised afterward. If you actually intended to update an existing record rather than create a new one, use Bulk Edit on the list page instead of re-importing.
Why does a record I didn't touch suddenly show as due for re-review?
If a record is on a Recertification schedule or a custom-field Survey, its "seal" breaks the moment anyone *other than the field's original owner* edits it β even a small, unrelated field change. This is deliberate: it's a safeguard against a record quietly drifting out of date because someone other than the accountable owner touched it. The fix is the same one-click "mark reviewed" action used for any other overdue recertification.
Why does retiring an Architectural Service require approval, but every other edit to it doesn't?
This is intentional, not a bug: for most governed record types the *creation/launch* is what's governed, but for an Architectural Service the governed transition is specifically retiring it, since decommissioning a service β especially a tier-1 one β is the operation with real blast radius. A service opens for editing straight to "active" with no review needed; only the retire action routes through Review Requests/Approval Chain.
Why can't Global Search find something I know exists?
Global Search only covers major catalog entity types (applications, decisions, capabilities, and so on) within your own workspace's data β it does not search this manual's text, and it never returns another workspace's records. If you're looking for a manual topic rather than catalog data, use this manual's chapter list (or its per-chapter browser find) instead.